The chart shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart compares the percentage of male and female teachers in six kinds of educational setting from nursery/pre-school to university in the UK in 2010.
Overall, education for children and teenagers are dominated by women. Meanwhile, men dominated higher education.
The percentage of women teaching at nursery/pre-school was much higher than men, at approximately 98% while men only had around 2%. Women also played an important role of primary school with the percentage of over 90%, while men's was just nearly 10%. The gap of male and female teachers in secondary school is considerably reduced when women contributed about 52% and men's was 48%. Especially, the percentage of women and men teaching at college was the same, both at 50%.
Besides, the percentage of male teachers in private training institute was higher than the percentage of female teachers with 52% while female teachers' was 48%. Additionally, men who are lecturers at university are more common than women with the percentage was 70% and the rest was female teachers with 30%.
- The widespread use of the Internet has brought many problems What do you think are the main problems associated with the use of the web What solutions can you suggest 68
- People who cause their own illnesses through unhealthy lifestyles and poor diets should have to pay more for health care To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 66
- Some people believe that competitive sports both team and individual have no place in the school curriculum How far do you agree or disagree 73
- New technologies and ways of buying and selling are transforming the lives of consumers To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- The table below shows the projected costings over the next five year in American dollars for three environmental projects for sustainable forestry The pie chart shows the expected expenditure breakdown allocation for the first year as the projects are set 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 180, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ale teachers was 48%. Additionally, men who are lecturers at university are more common...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19883040936 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05449070675 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520467836257 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6535737731 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7777777778 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17182038478 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874001258822 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0997205395969 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141234890735 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117372698168 0.0819641961636 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.