The chart shows the proportion of renewable energy in total energy supply in 4 countries from 1997 to 2010
The bar chart illustrates the information about renewable energy used in four major nations between 1997 and 2010.
Overall, there was a upward trend in using renewable energy in Sweden and Iceland, whereas Australia saw a downward tendency over the given period. The amount of renewable energy in Iceland made up for the largest proportion in comparison with other nations.
In 1997, approximately a half of renewable energy was harnessed in Iceland, which was the largest figure. The number continued increasing and peaked at over 70 per cent after 13 years, followed by Turkey, where the amount of this energy constituted for around 38 per cent during the shown period, even though there are some fluctuations throughout the period.
Australia and Sweden showed the different trend, although they together made up for under 10 percent over 13 years. While the amount of renewable energy in Australia was gradually decreased, Sweden saw a increased figured.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 20, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...en 1997 and 2010. Overall, there was a upward trend in using renewable energy ...
^
Line 7, column 203, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...lia was gradually decreased, Sweden saw a increased figured.
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 815.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29220779221 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66278900197 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616883116883 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6723961449 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.428571429 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265685627111 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137359025439 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788201234638 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176836826873 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0678837162929 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.