The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019.
The pie chart illustrates multiple purposes of adolescents in one African nation utilizing their phone over a period from 2016 to 2019. Overall, most teenagers used their phone to access social networking sites in four years surveyed, while the phone calls was the least used feature
Initially, the percentage of teenagers making use of phone for social networks dominated all the charts. It occupied 50% in 2016, then underwent a slight fluctuation before hitting the peak of 56% in 2019. On the contrary, the minority of teenagers ultilize phone to make a phone calls. This reason accounted for 10% in 2016, then was halved to 5% in 2019.
The ratio of adolescents using phone for email and digital camera kept the second and the third postion in the chart respectively. Time witnessed a minimal decrease in the former, which made up 19% in 2019, less than 6% as compared with that in 2016. Besides, the latter remained stable in the first two years surveyed, before rising at 20% in 2019.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | Phạm Gia Bảo | view | |
| 2023-08-02 | taman150507 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-21 | drikbest | 67 | view |
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development 73
- The chart below shows the average hours spent per day in leisure and sports activities by youngest and oldest populations in the US in 2015 70
- The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 84
- The chart below shows the number of visitors to the main attractions in a Europe country between 1981 and 2001 77
- he chart below shows the number of visitors to the main attractions in a Europe country between 1981 and 2001 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, second, so, then, third, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 825.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85294117647 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51355494818 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641176470588 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6516542149 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.125 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356883712101 0.215688989381 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136605495445 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705589789156 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232435035079 0.15604864568 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645065294585 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.