The chart shows the sports played in Australia in 2003. All figures in percentage.
The specific bar chart reveals the knowledge about the sports played in Australia during the year 2003. The data is described in per centum. Which is clear and current representated.
Generally, it is described that in Australia maximum girls were participated in netball. While, the minimum girls were played cricket. On the other hand, the maximum boys played soccer and least boy played netball.
In the beginning, the 14% boys and 22% girls participated in swimming during the year 2003 in Australia. Moving forward, the 24% boys and 5% girls were participated in soccer. Apart from this, in the sport of netball that 1% boys and 25% girls were played the netball. Furthermore, the sports of tennis, the boys and girls participated in 9% and 7% respectively.
In addition to this, the 8% boys and 6% girls were played basketball in the year 2003 in Australia. As well as, the sports of material arts 10% played by the boys while 4% by girls. Another sport is athletics the 4% boys played, as well as the 6% girls participated. Moving ahead, the maximum boys were participated in cricket at 10%, however, the girls 1% play this sport. Moreover, the participation in other games were boys and girls at 20% and 13% respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...mum girls were participated in netball. While, the minimum girls were played cricket....
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, well, while, apart from, in addition, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1028.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87203791469 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76726931737 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464454976303 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 13.0 4.33902439024 300% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.2566843892 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 68.5333333333 112.824112599 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0666666667 22.9334400587 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 3.70975609756 297% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196117198536 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882541547931 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0815846056999 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156009080663 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483248684247 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 13.2329268293 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.65 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.37 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.4329268293 44% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.