The chart shows the unemployment situation in Australia in the year 2012.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph compares two different rural and urban regions of Australia in terms of the unemployment rate over a 4-quarter period in the year 2012.
Overall, despite various ups and downs, a downward trend was observed for the joblessness in the countryside. However, it was not the case for the unemployment level in cities. Additionally, the proportion of unemployed Australians living in the suburban regions was slightly higher than that in cities over the survey.
At the initial quarter of the year, a total of about 10% of people are jobless in Australia, over three-fifth being lived in rural areas, a quarter in the urban regions. In the subsequent three months, the figure for jobless people in the country fell significantly a further 2% to its bottom level at below 5%, prior to experiencing a mild recovery to 5.5% at the beginning of the third quarter, followed by some mild variations and a static phase at 5% in the last month of the year.
In contrast, in the second quarter, the latter had a great increase of 2% despite also dipping to its initial level in the third quarter. After continuing going up and down, the rate of the unemployed in cities increased rapidly and reached its peak at roughly 5%, almost the same as rurales' figure.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...5%, almost the same as rurales figure.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, so, third, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1053.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83027522936 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74034485821 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56880733945 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.4322576739 43.030603864 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.625 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.080812199578 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0401292533262 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404304764388 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0590162289995 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445825814072 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.