The line graph below gives information about the rates of unemployment between 1991 and 2005 in three different countries in Europe. The table shows the percentage of men and women in the workforce in these three countries.
The first line graph illustrates the unemployment levels in three different nations including Spain, Germany, and Italy over a 15- year period. The accompanying table demonstrates the proportion of female and male workers in the same countries during the survey.
In general, the initial impression from the chart is that the level of joblessness witnessed some fluctuations at varying degrees for all three nations. To be more specified, a downward trend was observed for the number of the Spanish and Italy unemployed. However, this was not the case for people in Germany. Additionally, it is apparent that jobless men accounted for a higher percentage than their opposite counterparts among the three nations.
As can be seen from the first picture, in 1991, with approximately 13% of people who currently had no job, Spain took the lead in terms of unemployment level, twofold higher than the figure in Italy. The number of the former surged at its highest point at 18% in 1993, continuing to remain unchanged until 1995 prior to dipping greatly to 8% in 2005. By contrast, there was a major rise of 4% in the unemployment rates for the latter, peaking at the same level as Spain in 1999, followed by a marginal decrease and its figure experienced a static phase at its initial level. The most significant change was the number of jobless German, despite starting from the lowest point among three countries with 4%, the unemployment rates in Germany saw a continuous increase with ups and downs, overtaking the two remaining nations to be an area with the highest level of joblessness in 2005.
It is apparent from the second picture that male Italian accounted for the largest number at over 77%, followed by men in Germany and Spain respectively. On the other hand, the number of women in who were jobless in Germany was higher than their Spanish and Italian counterparts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: CONTINUE_TO_REMAIN[1]
Message: Use simply 'remaining'.
Suggestion: remaining
...ed at its highest point at 18% in 1993, continuing to remain unchanged until 1995 prior to dipping g...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 33.7804878049 169% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 965.302439024 163% => OK
No of words: 316.0 196.424390244 161% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97151898734 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77526232934 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 106.607317073 157% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528481012658 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 283.868780488 165% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.0194301991 43.030603864 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.916666667 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15404361863 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561395739832 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495804996508 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100356654802 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611891882758 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 40.7170731707 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.