The bar chart illustrates the percentage of various levels of literacy that prevailed among different age groups in 2010 and pie chart groups same data on the basis of gender.
Overall, most unqualified people belonged to oldest generation while university education was most common among younger age groups. In terms of gender, men were generally highly qualified than women.
It is evident from bar chart that elder population had largest percentage of people with no qualification, starting from 30% in 50 to 75 years old and rising sharply to 72% in age above that. In others, it stayed constant at 9% of people being unqualified. In contrast, 71% of youngsters of age ranging from 16 to 50 years possessed university degree except age group 24 to 35, which had a percentage of 75%. Similarly, the percentage of school qualification was 20% in all age groups except 24 to 35 years and above 75 years old, where it stood on 15% and 3% respectively.
In pie chart, it can be seen that having no qualification at all was more prevalent among women with 38%, in contrast to of 35% of unqualified men. Equal number of men and women (33%) held school degree though. However, 32% of men possessed a university diploma as compared to only 29% of women.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 43, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the oldest'.
Suggestion: to the oldest
...erall, most unqualified people belonged to oldest generation while university education w...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 52, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the largest'.
Suggestion: had the largest
...nt from bar chart that elder population had largest percentage of people with no qualificat...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 182, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d men. Equal number of men and women 33% held school degree though. However, 32% ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, similarly, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1033.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76036866359 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79111303291 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585253456221 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3418419583 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.3 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0641980258438 0.215688989381 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0243673598657 0.103423049105 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423483976108 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0520267282082 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528954339731 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.