The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000, and the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years.
The two bar charts illustrates the number of marriage and divorce rates in the USA from 1970 to 2000 as well as different marital status of adults Americans in two of the years.
Overall, it can be seen that the number of marriages rate was far higher than divorces rate, over the 40 years period, and the highest proportion of adults American did married in both years.
As is observed from the first graphs, the number of marriage rate stood at 2.5 million in 1970, and then it gradually decline to reached at 2 million in 2000. In contrast, the divorce rate in the USA was 1 million in 1970, and it rose to around 1.4 million in next decades. After 1980, the divorce rate was steadily fall to 1 million in 2000, which was the same as first decades.
The second graph describe, married was most popular than the other marital status in American adults. In 1970, 70 percent of American adults did married, and it slightly decline in 2000 was about 60 percent. The widowed and divorced rate was much lower under 10 percent in both years. Americans adult who did not married was above 10 percent in 1970, and it increased to 20 percent in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-21 | khanhptk162 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | khanhptk162 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-12 | Nisha_k | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | abelin | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | Ali Rizwan | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 67
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the green house gas emissions which result from this energy use. 67
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. 73
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? 56
- Women are better at childcare than men therefore they should focus more on raising children and less on their working life To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 170, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'marry'
Suggestion: marry
...ghest proportion of adults American did married in both years. As is observed from the...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'declines'?
Suggestion: declines
... million in 1970, and then it gradually decline to reached at 2 million in 2000. In con...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 316, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'fallen'.
Suggestion: fallen
...ter 1980, the divorce rate was steadily fall to 1 million in 2000, which was the sam...
^^^^
Line 4, column 145, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'marry'
Suggestion: marry
...1970, 70 percent of American adults did married, and it slightly decline in 2000 was ab...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 170, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'declines'?
Suggestion: declines
...can adults did married, and it slightly decline in 2000 was about 60 percent. The widow...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, then, well, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 940.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.4976076555 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24983179193 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497607655502 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1805737144 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.444444444 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395910470614 0.215688989381 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182769408892 0.103423049105 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134657799488 0.0843802449381 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.283551060268 0.15604864568 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.157896879303 0.0819641961636 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.