The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000.
Water use, selected countries - 2000?
The given circular chart and horizontal chart reveals the information about the uses of water in the world, and four selected countries by the three different ways during the year 2000. The data is calibrated in percentum which is clearly and coherently represented.
It is crystal clear from the chart, the highest amount of water was used for agriculture. In addition to this, the lowest amount of water had used for domestic purpose. Moreover, the water used for agriculture, domestic and industry was 70%,8% and 22% respectively.
As far as trend was concerned that, during the year 2000 the water used for agriculture in the canada was 8%. After that, India and China were used most of water in the purposes of agriculture. Futhermore, In New Zealand water used for agruculture, domestic and industry was 44%,46% and 10% respectively.
Overall, it is evident that India nation had highest rate in uses of water for agriculture as compare to other three nation
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 42, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the highest'.
Suggestion: had the highest
...verall, it is evident that India nation had highest rate in uses of water for agriculture a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 118, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'nation' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'nations'.
Suggestion: nations
...r agriculture as compare to other three nation
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 807.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01242236025 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75940021964 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521739130435 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5046537813 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6666666667 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8888888889 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.456921428066 0.215688989381 212% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.193147713881 0.103423049105 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121764582314 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271658366245 0.15604864568 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12235064524 0.0819641961636 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.