The charts below give information about world spending and population.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons
where relevant.
Write at least 150 words
We can see two detached charts about World Spending ratio and World Population ratio. In World Spending chart it can be seen that there are some comparisons between food, clothing, housing, transport and other. In World Population chart it can be seen that the comparisons are between the cotinents.
In World Spending chart the most value is in food sector. The food consists twenty-four percent of the chart. So it can be seen that money is mostly spent for food which is vital for human beings. After that transportation consist eighteen percent of the chart which may not be considered as vital for human beings. But the importance given on transportation is high so it can be said that people likes traveling. Housing is in third place which is crucial for human beings to provide protection from other humans and nature itself, and it consists of 12 percent of the chart. In fourth place, there is clothing and it is 6 percent. There are several thing that can be called as ‘’Other’’ and it is fourty percent.
In world population chart it is seen that Asia has the most population which consists fifty-seven percentage of the chart. After Asia it is seen that Europe and Americas are placed. Americas and Europe have the same amount of people living on. Altough Europe land is smaller than Americas due to density of their population they have the same amount. Africa comes afterwards which consist of ten percent of the chart. At last place it is seen Other which consist of Antartica, Australia and the Polars.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...mparisons are between the cotinents. In World Spending chart the most value is ...
^^
Line 3, column 644, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun thing seems to be countable; consider using: 'several things'.
Suggestion: several things
...clothing and it is 6 percent. There are several thing that can be called as ''Other...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 652, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'things'?
Suggestion: things
... and it is 6 percent. There are several thing that can be called as ''Other...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 7.0 329% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 3.15609756098 444% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 22.0 5.60731707317 392% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1285.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 263.0 196.424390244 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88593155894 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91574743061 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460076045627 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 382.5 283.868780488 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 8.94146341463 190% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.6312983318 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.5882352941 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4705882353 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.35294117647 5.23603664747 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.09268292683 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0972153666626 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411062323855 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471985827033 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0792167546993 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432361300343 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.