The charts below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, an make comparisions where relevant.

The pie charts provide information on the proportion of the different ages of populations in Yemen and Italy in 2000 and it is also predicted the trends up to 2050.

It can be seen from the charts that the percentage of 15-59 years age group populations is likely to increase 57.3 in 2050 from 46.39 in 2000. At the same time, the figure for elder group is also estimated to rise slightly from 3.8% to 5.7 % respectively. In contrast, the proportion of younger age group is likely to halve marginally from a half ( 50.1% ) to roughly a third ( 37% ) during the given period.

Turning to Italy, the percentage of elder group (60+years) population is anticipated to rise approximately a double from 2000 to 2050. However, the other two groups are predicted to drop during this period of time. When younger group populations is likely to decline to 11.5% in 2050, it was 14.3% in 2000. Similarly, the statistical data for 15 to 59 age group is also decrease to 46.2% from 61.6% within given period.

Overall, it is clear from the charts that the percentage of the elder group population is showing an increasing trend, whereas the other two age groups are falling in both given countries.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lso predicted the trends up to 2050. It can be seen from the charts that the ...
^^
Line 3, column 350, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s likely to halve marginally from a half 50.1% to roughly a third 37% during t...
^^
Line 3, column 357, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y to halve marginally from a half 50.1% to roughly a third 37% during the give...
^^
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y from a half 50.1% to roughly a third 37% during the given period. Tur...
^^
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m a half 50.1% to roughly a third 37% during the given period. Turning ...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hird 37% during the given period. Turning to Italy, the percentage of elde...
^^^
Line 5, column 201, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...roups are predicted to drop during this period of time. When younger group populations is like...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 299, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o decline to 11.5% in 2050, it was 14.3% in 2000. Similarly, the statistical data...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 46.2% from 61.6% within given period. Overall, it is clear from the charts t...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 169, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the other two age groups are falling in both given countries.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, similarly, so, third, whereas, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71980676329 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64571199771 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51690821256 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0016834587 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.555555556 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178306198721 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892775935774 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.082463614009 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146188490435 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0870456786283 0.0819641961636 106% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.