The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph provides information on the amount of goods transported by four various mode of transportation in the UK from 1974 to 2002.Units are measured in million tonnes.

It can be seen from the graph that in 1974, the highest amount of goods transported by road ways at well over 60 million tonnes, whereas the least was only around 5 million tonnes by pipeline. Meanwhile, the figures for both rail and water were almost the same amount at average 40 million tonnes in the UK.

However, the quantity of goods transported by road showed an increasing trend, which rose significantly to a peak of well under 100 million tonnes by 2002. At the same time , the amount of goods transported by ship rose slightly to reach just under 60 million tonnes in 1986, then it stabilised till 1994. But gradually figures declined dramatically in 1998, before reaching around 62 million tonnes in 2002 . Between 1978 and 1998, the products transported by rail was fluctuated and then it grew slowly in 2002. In terms of pipe line, the trend showed some differences during the period of time. It soared to roughly 24 million tonnes in 1982 and remained the constant in 1990. Interestingly, the data dropped marginally to exact 20 million tonnes in 1997 and in untill 2002.

Overall, the goods transported except by pipe line noticed a hiking trend within given period.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'mode' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'modes'.
Suggestion: modes
...nt of goods transported by four various mode of transportation in the UK from 1974 t...
^^^^
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Units
...nsportation in the UK from 1974 to 2002.Units are measured in million tonnes. It...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...from 1974 to 2002.Units are measured in million tonnes. It can be seen from the gr...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...5 million tonnes by pipeline. Meanwhile, the figures for both rail and water were...
^^
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...million tonnes by 2002. At the same time , the amount of goods transported by ship...
^^
Line 5, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...llion tonnes in 1986, then it stabilised till 1994. But gradually figures decline...
^^
Line 5, column 410, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...eaching around 62 million tonnes in 2002 . Between 1978 and 1998, the products tra...
^^
Line 5, column 585, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...rend showed some differences during the period of time. It soared to roughly 24 million tonnes...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, well, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1138.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88412017167 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64900367341 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56652360515 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8790742251 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.454545455 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1818181818 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23311160239 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0965820753988 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0922315537499 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171538660556 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105498216562 0.0819641961636 129% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.