The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph illustrates, the amount of goods transported by four various modes in UK from 1974 to 2002. Units are measured in million tonnes.

Overall, overwhelming majority of transportation done by roads and the least amount of goods traveled by pipeline over two decades in London. At the start of a period, water and rail transport services are at same level, whereas, after four years there were a gradual increase over rail by water goods service.

Regarding transportation by road was the highest among other four service with around 70 million tonnes in 1974. This figure remained relatively stable for next 20 years, when there was a significant growth pictured with near 100 million tonnes by 2002. Moreover, pipeline service was started with mere two million tonnes and rapidly climbed on above 20 million tonnes in 1982, which stayed almost stable in following years and finished with 20000million tonnes at the end of period.

On the other hand, goods transportation by rail and water was relatively stable in first four years with 40,000million tonnes. Whereas, rapid surge on water service for over ten years after slight reduction in 1998 which went up to above 60,000 tonnes in 2002. Similarly, rail service dip into below 20,000 about 20 year period, though which reached to the starting level by 2002.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...rom 1974 to 2002. Units are measured in million tonnes. Overall, overwhelming majori...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 465, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and finished with 20000million tonnes at the end of period. On the other hand,...
^^
Line 7, column 272, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... above 60,000 tonnes in 2002. Similarly, rail service dip into below 20,000 about...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, regarding, similarly, whereas, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1118.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10502283105 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57381994569 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552511415525 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1758594939 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.8 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155484717115 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816239483998 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0933751548375 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131774929581 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0873448689254 0.0819641961636 107% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.