The charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010
The pie charts compare the average proportion of household expensed in Japan and Malaysia based on five categories: housing, transport, food, healthcare and other services in the year 2010.
It can be obviously seen, the majority of expenditure on housing, other goods and services, food by both two nations citizens. In addition, while Japanese paid attention on other goods and services, Malaysian chose to spend money on housing in 2010.
The average of housing in Malaysia was the highest accounted for about a third of total compared to Japan which just constituted above 20 percent. The proportion of spending on food was more than other goods and services made up quite similar, just 27 percent and 26 percent respectively in malaysia. The ratio of transport accounted for nearly one out of ten, three-times as much as the figure for healthcare in this country.
It is clear that all the figures for Japan are similar with those in Malay. Japanese spent their budget mainly for three items which same as Malaysian, whereas the proportion of consuming on other goods and services was the largest, allocated approximately three-tenth. In terms of housing and food, the figures for both household expenses were nearly same, at 21 percent for housing and 24 percent for food. The average transport expenditures as around three-times larger as healthcare, constituted exactly two out of ten, saw a similar pattern with the ratio in Malaysia.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 301, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nd 26 percent respectively in malaysia. The ratio of transport accounted for nearly...
^^^
Line 4, column 474, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...penditures as around three-times larger as healthcare, constituted exactly two out...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
third, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1213.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13983050847 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76199364169 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546610169492 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9680148022 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.3 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182896673736 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801678977922 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0962866957194 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142317580716 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115045672761 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.