The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant.
The provided pie charts illustrate the average percentage of each nutritious kinds in four typical meals obtained in the USA. If it is consumed too much, it will be harmful to people’s health.
From a general perspective, dinner require the largest amounts of two out of three nutrients, namely sodium and saturated fat, while the most added sugar was eaten in snacks.
On average, it is noticeable that sodium stand at the first rank in the evening meal, at 43%. Besides, the second largest comsumption belongs to the statistic of the rate of saturated fat at dinner. By contrast, added sugar, which accounted for only 23% at dinner, contributes the highest detail to the percentage of it in snacks, at 42%.
Looking at the pie charts in more detail, we can see that standing at less than a fifth, breakfast and dinner obtaine the least amount of sodium. Likewise, the proportions of saturated fat and added sugar eaten at breakfast share the equal figure, at 16%. In addition, the rates of the three types of nutrients seemed quite same at lunch, which formed 29% sodium, 26% saturated fat, and 19% added sugar.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-06 | Tosyne | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-03 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-03 | Daniel3003 | 70 | view |
| 2023-11-03 | Daniel3003 | view | |
| 2022-12-27 | samuel961 | view |
- the graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 20
- The line graph compares the percentage of people in three countries who used the Internet between 1999 and 2009 60
- The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening courses at an adult education centre in the year 2009 The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participants 73
- the graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in different parts of the world 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, likewise, look, second, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 929.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83854166667 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54447739907 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630208333333 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5541413814 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.222222222 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116902325786 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575053718049 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468769524128 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0854307930021 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638270845088 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.