Some Governments say how many children a family can have in their country should be strictly controlled. They may control the number of children someone has through taxes. Is It sometimes necessary and right for a government to control the population in this way?
Do you agree or disagree with this policy?
In contemporary society, tax policy is stipulated by governments to reduce the population boom. It is argued that imposing the tax to limit their populations to a sustainable figure is a feasible measure to control this phenomenon. Nevertheless, I maintain that its downsides are outweigh the benefits.
On the one hand, some people who know about the long term economic consequences of having over three children in later life tend to make good family planning. For example, family planning can help people to avoid withstanding financial burdens because they not only have to bring their children up but also pay more tax to the government. According to an Oxford survey, 80% of families advise others should place more importance on following family planning than on relaxing due to tax.
On the other hand, I incline that money plays an indispensable role because poverty, illiteracy, unhygienic lifestyle and crime stem from the lack of money. Therefore, if people have more children than the law allows, they could suffer from a domino effect related to money like bankruptcy, or debt because they have to pay for the tax. In addition, kids need more attention than adults, so parents have to meet emotional requirements and cultivate their spirits. However, except for the upper and middle classes, the poor could become pessimistic and be an alcoholic because they never achieve the route to fulfillment from an economic perspective, so they can not build a close relationship because they can not control their temper.
In conclusion, while some people think that tax is a fundamental approach to restrict the number of offspring, I believe the tax should not be overused due to its mentioned consequences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 281, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'outweighed'.
Suggestion: outweighed
...less, I maintain that its downsides are outweigh the benefits. On the one hand, some pe...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, except for, for example, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15357142857 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86425676865 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607142857143 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.1888993686 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.181818182 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4545454545 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8181818182 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288668586456 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963659572465 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578005317775 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157421505054 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025489452285 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.