The maps below illustrate how Frenton changed from 1990 to 2012

Essay topics:

The maps below illustrate how Frenton changed from 1990 to 2012.

The diagrams illustrate the similarities and differences that took place in Frenton in the 1990-2012 period. In general, while there were not any accommodations bbe removed during these years, some facilities were replaced and built in 2012.

Regarding similarities between 1990 and 2012, a school which was located in the Northern left corner of Frenton was maintained throughout this period. Likewise, there was a library situated on the left side of the High Street in both 1990 and 2012, which was in the middle of Frenton. In addition, a hospital by the library was maintained, whereas, there was the expansion of its all dimensions.
Looking at the diagram in more detail, it is noticeable that houses and playing fields with trees were replaced with blocks of flats in 2012. Also, café and park were converted into a hotel and golf course, which was surrounded by flats on the North, cinema, and supermarket in lieu of theatre and shops in 1990. On the left side of the High Street, a bank, which was located next to the hospital, was knocked down and a restaurant was constructed in this space. Trees on the South were cut down for the construction of a technopark.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, likewise, look, regarding, so, whereas, while, in addition, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 980.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87562189055 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72046060772 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55223880597 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.0 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.888888889 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88888888889 5.23603664747 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142453698883 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733486386365 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853380414675 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115481710564 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607364072629 0.0819641961636 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.