Some Governments say how many children a family can have in their country should be strictly controlled. They may control the number of children someone has through taxes. Is It sometimes necessary and right for a government to control the population in this way?
Do you agree or disagree with this policy?
In contemporary society, tax policy, which is stipulated by governments to reduce the population boom, has become a debatable issue in many parts of the world. It is argued that imposing the tax to limit their populations to a sustainable figure is a feasible measure. Nevertheless, I maintain that the striking downside of overusing tax outweigh the benefits.
On the one hand, some people, who know about the long term economic consequences of having over three children in later life, tend to make good family planning. For example, family planning can help people to avoid withstanding financial burdens because they not only have to bring their children up but also pay more tax to the government. According to an Oxford survey, 80% of families advise others should place more importance on following family planning than on relaxing due to tax.
On the other hand, I incline that money plays an indispensable role because poverty, illiteracy, unhygienic lifestyle and crime stem from the lack of money. Therefore, if people have more children than the law allows, they could suffer from a domino effect related to money like bankruptcy, or debt because they have to pay for the tax. In addition, kids need more attention than adults, so parents have to meet emotional requirements and cultivate their spirits. However, except for the upper and middle classes, the poor could become pessimistic and be an alcoholic because they never achieve the route to fulfillment from an economic perspective, so they can not build a close relationship because they can not control their temper.
In conclusion, while some people think that tax is a fundamental approach to restrict the number of offspring, I believe the tax should not be overused due to its mentioned consequences, such as the uninsured security, low-quality living conditions, environment, family violence, and divorces.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, except for, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21710526316 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89264278325 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615131578947 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.1292183511 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.181818182 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6363636364 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6363636364 7.06120827912 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282546298525 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909348280061 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050363196186 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145520817957 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297955330998 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.