The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
The two diagrams illustrate the comparison of similarities, as well as differences, of an island before and after finishing the tourist facilities.
At first glance, there were various added facilities after the development of tourism; as a result, this place was turned from uninhabited island to the residential and tourism one.
It is noticeable that there were 15 accommodations which were constructed in the centre and the West of this island. Also, on the Northside of this place, a restaurant was built behind a reception, which was surrounded by the vehicle track. The footpath was developed to create ways for households. Besides, this area had palm trees dotted around in the whole period.
Turning to some broadened changes, although the beach on the West before completing the tourist facilities was not for human beings, after developing, people were allowed to swim. In addition, a pier was added to the South with several sailboats. Nevertheless, the area of this island was unchangeable throughout this period.
- The graph shows the number of marriages and divorces in the UK between 1975 and 2000 72
- The graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in five countries 78
- Many things can influence the academic achievement and emotional growth of a student Peers have more of an impact than teachers 84
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Some people feel that certain workers like nurses doctors and teachers should be paid more while many people think that other people like film actors or singers should be paid huge sums of money due to the importance of the work that they do and their rol 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, if, nevertheless, so, well, in addition, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 868.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29268292683 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98802886169 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621951219512 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.7524201613 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4444444444 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2222222222 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.55555555556 5.23603664747 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209769564756 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810673029861 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0998219323261 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149873809308 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0977081979669 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.