The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Average percentages of sodium saturated fats and added sugars in typical meals consumed in the USA Average percentag

Essay topics:

The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
Average percentages of sodium, saturated fats and added sugars in typical meals consumed in the USA

Average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients

The provided pie charts depict the ratio of sodium, saturated fat and added sugar in four average daily meals, breakfast, lunch, dinner and snacks, which are consumed by the American and the overconsumption of these three nutrients may be detrimental to health.

Overall, intake of sodium and saturated fat are rich in dinner and lunch, while added sugar is mostly eaten in snacks. In addition, breakfast is least nutrient-dense whereas lunch and dinner have high portion of these nutrients.

Regarding sodium and saturated fat, both kinds of nutrients are mostly taken into from dinner which account for 43% and 37% respectively while the percentages of them in lunch ranks secondly, with 29% and 26%. Intake of these two nutrients during breakfast and snacks are comparatively lower than the other two meals, around 14% - 20% each time.

In term of added sugar, there was a greatest disparity between snacks and other meals. The proportion of this nutrient makes up over 40% for snacks, which is nearly double the figure of dinner, at 23%, and is considerably higher than this ratio in lunch with 19%. The same as other types of nutrients, breakfast is not dense in added sugar, just 16%.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 36, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
.... In term of added sugar, there was a greatest disparity between snacks and o...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
may, regarding, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1005.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05025125628 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58580741742 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603015075377 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6834729715 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.625 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.875 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212515027962 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090845038993 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078840516838 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137994825033 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736371378375 0.0819641961636 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.