The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts compare the average intake of three nutrients in four main meals, the overconsumption of which can be detrimental to health.
It is clear that sodium and saturated fat are rich in foods eaten in dinner while added sugar is mostly taken in from snacks. In addition, breakfast is the least nutrient-dense, which is revealed by the smallest pie on all charts.
Regarding sodium and saturated fat, both nutrients are mostly provided in evening meals, at 43% and 37% respectively, while the percentages of them in lunch consistently rank second, with 29% and 26%. Contrast is an equal proportion of sodium is contained in snacks and breakfast, accounting for 14% each, whereas the former meal is richer in saturated fat than the latter one, with 21% and 16% respectively.
In terms of added sugar, more than 40% of this nutrient is from snacks, which nearly doubles the figure for dinner, at 23%. The added sugar value in lunch is significantly lower, with 19%, while like other nutrients, breakfast is not dense in added sugar, contributing only 16%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, second, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 892.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98324022346 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81033906855 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631284916201 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5580332611 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.428571429 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116767130798 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0614624539533 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636801119988 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.087487102115 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0689827383096 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.