The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie charts illustrate the average percentage of three types of different nutrients which are predicted to unhealthy to eat too much - sodium, saturated fat, and added sugar eaten in four meals in the USA.
Overall, American inhabitants consume the largest amount of both sodium and saturated fat in dinner meanwhile the quantity of added sugar is likely to be the largest proportion got to taste in snacks. However, the percentage of sodium consumed in both breakfast and snack is a very small number, and also people less dine on food that contained saturated fat and added sugar in breakfast.
Firstly, there are 43% of sodium had in American people’s dinner while the proportion of this component consumed in snacks and breakfast is limited accounting for 14%. The quantity of sodium eaten in lunch comprises 29%.
Secondly, the amount of saturated fat takes up 37% had in dinner, compared to 16% of it eaten in breakfast. The percentage of saturated fat eaten in lunch, and snacks, which contribute 26%, and 21%, respectively.
The figure of added sugar got to taste in snacks consists of 42% but individuals enjoy a little of this ingredient breakfast including 16%. What is more, the proportion of added sugar consumed in dinner, and lunch, accounting for 23%, and 19%, respectively.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1091.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05092592593 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74569312284 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518518518519 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 0.482926829268 1242% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2123884178 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.222222222 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112663294266 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555914744543 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0895761097763 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.083186078458 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109325774368 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.