Task 2: Some people believe increasing business and cultural contacts between countries are a positive development while others argue that it is a threat to identity of a nation? Discuss both view and give your opinion?
In modern-day life, the masses cite that the tendency of business and cultural contact among countries is unequivocal progress. However, other ones perceive that this phenomenon will prompt cultural appropriation. This essay will explore both views before showing my outlook.
On the one hand, there are some testaments for me to opine the benefits of this trend. First and foremost, there is undeniable that robust relations between countries boost the national economy. To be more specific, it generates jobs and lucrative opportunities for laborers. For instance, the diplomatic ties between Vietnam and universal economic powerhouses create chances for the former, such as the commerce treaty, Vietnam penetrates its market and exchanges pretty much high-quality products with others.
Moreover, these diplomatic ties bridge the cultural gap among nations. It erases monumental hostility among parties evolved and also administers mutual understandings and corporation. Effectively, ordinary people are accessible to accept cultural dissimilarity.
On the other hand, this development also has an adverse bearing on nations, especially citizens who will be indifferent to their national identities. Admittedly, globalization lays a foundation for the foreign influence spreading out ubiquitously and renders to the worst scenario that is cultural appropriation and causes some distortions and mistles individuals’ mindset of national values and identities. As a result, people will marginalize their own culture, which is contributable to political affairs. In Vietnam, freedom of speech, which is a foreign culture, has a profound influence on Vietnamese people, especially teenagers.
Consequently, most inhabitants communicate freely without being aware of profanities spoken in public localities. Hence, adolescents are sadly lacking in consciousness, which can be a papable example.
To sum up, my take on them is that the globalization and exchange between parties evolved are advantageous. However, we should be aware of our roots and prioritize our traditional customs.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, look, moreover, so, for instance, such as, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1789.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.96333333333 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22982455664 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636666666667 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.8322615109 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3888888889 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151378503929 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0425096347755 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040330184545 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0642921712577 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489846661626 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.86 50.2224549098 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.99 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.43 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.