The charts below portray the proportion of households owning three electrical appliances(Washing machine, Refrigerator, Vacuum cleaner) and depicts the amount of hours of housework per week in each household, between 1920 and 2019.
Overall, we can observe that, between 1920 and 2019 the amount of households owning washing machine, refrigerators and vacuum cleaners have increased and along with that the total time spent behind housework each week in every household has been going down. So we can see a general trend; the time spent behind housework is decreasing as the fraction of households owning electrical appliances is increasing.
First of all, the electrical appliance that experienced the sharpest increase in usage is the Refrigerator, going from 0% in 1920 to 100% in 1980 and that figure stayed constant till 2019. The appliance that experienced the second steepest rise was the Vacuum cleaner. Initially, the percentage of families owning Vacuum cleaners was 30% and it grew to 100% in 2000 which and the value did not fall off. Next is the Washing machine, which did experience an overall increase in the number of households owning them, starting from 40% in 1920 to a little more than 7 out of 10 families owning them in 2019.
Lastly, if we look at the second graph we can infer a downward trend in the time, that each household spent every week behind house chores. The value was the highest(50 hours per week) in 1920 and it gradually decreased to 10 hours a week in 2019.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 97, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'machine' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'machines'.
Suggestion: machines
...ning three electrical appliancesWashing machine, Refrigerator, Vacuum cleaner and depic...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, lastly, look, second, so, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1251.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 251.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98406374502 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74041617196 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501992031873 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 351.0 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.9446410512 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.0 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8888888889 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221140316118 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100694145892 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754689081785 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158064138338 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0748961484639 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.