The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graphs inform the data of households' electrical devices’ percentages and the number of houseworks duration in a week from 1920 to 2019. Overall, as the percentage of households’ electrical appliances rose, the number of hours of houseworks decreased.
In 1920, the percentage of refrigerators was zero, as for vacuum cleaners was 30 and washing machines was 40. 20 years later, the percentage of households which owned the 3 appliances had apparently risen, especially for the fridge with 55 percent. Meanwhile the percentage which represented the washing machines was 60, as for the vacuum cleaner, there was 50 percent of households in the nation that owned a vacuum cleaner. The percentage of which presented the refrigerator continued to rise many years later, 90 percent of houses in the country had a fridge in 1960. It remained stable at 100 percent from 1980 to 2019. Things went similarly for vacuum cleaners, the data increased steadily with 60 percent in 1960, 90 percent in 1980 and 100 percent from 2000 to 2019. Last but not least, the data fluctuated for washing machines. In 1960, it reached 70 percent, in 1980, it dropped to 63 percent, then rose again and reached 70 percent in 2000, it almost hit 80 percent in 2019.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...ecially for the fridge with 55 percent. Meanwhile the percentage which represented the wa...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 794, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t from 2000 to 2019. Last but not least, the data fluctuated for washing machines...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, similarly, then, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1039.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97129186603 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83140414478 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507177033493 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.555958249 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.9 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0947675816482 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0528192233005 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598223966317 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126410764331 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0822917777995 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.