The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The line graph illustrates information regarding the household electrical appliances such as washing machines, refrigerators, and vacuum cleaners avail by people per hour per household during the period from 1920 to 2000. Overall, it can be seen that the use of refrigerators and vacuum cleaners increased considerably during the given period, whereas the availability of washing machines declined further, washing machines had a downward trend in comparison to the other two.
Another noticeable change that can be seen is that availing of the refrigerator was about 5%in 1920 however, it steeply increased to around 100%over 60 years
The availability of a washing machine was at 40%in 1920,decreased slightly about 10%in 1980,also although increased up to 20%over year's.The use of vacuum cleaner was 30% in 1920 and increased up to 100%in 2000 and remains constant in 2019.it can be seen that the time period of working hours per week per house was 50% in 1920 whereas it declined to 15% in 1980 and more steeply down to 10% in 2019 over 99years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly increased to around 100%over 60 years The availability of a washing machine wa...
^^^
Line 3, column 137, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... although increased up to 20%over years.The use of vacuum cleaner was 30% in 1920 a...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, regarding, so, whereas, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 881.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15204678363 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9091201526 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590643274854 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 3.0 8.94146341463 34% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 57.0 22.4926829268 253% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 158.259280928 43.030603864 368% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 293.666666667 112.824112599 260% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 57.0 22.9334400587 249% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 15.3333333333 5.23603664747 293% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0997691028062 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721786813161 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436729860411 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0685483226964 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0166783576773 0.0819641961636 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 31.3 13.2329268293 237% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 22.08 61.2550243902 36% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 24.3 10.3012195122 236% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.48 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.16 8.06136585366 126% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 11.4329268293 179% => OK
gunning_fog: 24.8 10.9970731707 226% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.