The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in household in one country between 1920 and 2019. Summarizes the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph give information about the changes in freeholder of galvanic of apparatus and amounts of time spent doing housework in one country from 1920 to 2019.
It is clear that, the rate of household with electrical appliances in 2019 of vacuum cleaner is highest. But the number of hours in 2028 is lowest. However, the completely different we can see if we look at the specific figures.
Look at the first line graph, the percentage of house with electrical appliances of refrigerator in 1920 is lowest and have number is 0%. Meanwhile, in 2000 this number is significantly increased is 100% and have the same number is vacuum cleaner in 2019. Has the second lowest number after Refrigerator is Vacuum cleaner in 1940 is 50% and Refrigerator have the same number by the compared with 1920 has increased by 40 times. With washing machine in 1920 is 40% and 1940 is 60%. However, in 1960 all three electrical devices is all increased compared to 30 years ago, washing machine is 70%, Refrigerator is 90% and Vacuum cleaner is 70%. In 2000, all is stable.
Look at the second line graph,hours of housework per week in 2019 is lowest only have 10 hours. However, in the first year is 1920 is highest and figure is 50 hours. Meanwhile, in 1940 and 1960 is decreased, in 1940 about 30 hours and 1960 is 20 hours. With the remaining 2 years, in 1980 and 2000 have the same number about 15 hours. So, it can be seen that people in 2019 know more save electro than other years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 30, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , hours
...s stable. Look at the second line graph,hours of housework per week in 2019 is lowest...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 67, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the lowest'.
Suggestion: is the lowest
...aph,hours of housework per week in 2019 is lowest only have 10 hours. However, in the fir...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 7.0 343% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1213.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 267.0 196.424390244 136% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54307116105 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54004387007 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.456928838951 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 342.9 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.3289228525 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.8666666667 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142262602503 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0520471891208 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0834771583594 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129067826042 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1186328878 0.0819641961636 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.55 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.