The charts below show degrees granted in different fields at the National University in the years 1990 2000 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The charts below show degrees granted in different fields at the National University in the years 1990, 2000, and 2010.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie charts depict the proportion of degrees awarded to students at the National University, particularly in the field of Medicine, Law, Business and Computer Science over three successive decades – 1990, 2000 and 2010.

In 1990, both Business and Computer Science received the highest percentages, wherein each received 30% of degrees given to students. Medicine and Law followed closely with 25% and 15%, respectively.

In 2000, Computer Science was able to retained the top spot by gaining a 10% increase in percentage, while Medicine gained the second highest percentage at 30%. Business, however, dropped to third place after losing 10% and similarly Law has taken last place after losing 5%.

In 2010, standings of the four fields remained similar with Computer Science continuing to dominate at 45% of the degrees given. Medicine retained second place despite losing 5%. Both Business and Law occupied the last spot, each having 15% of the overall standing.

In conclusion, over the three decades, there is a steady rise of students graduating in Computer Science at National University. Graduates from other fields like Medicine and Law fluctuated over the years, while Business graduated declined steadily over the years.

Votes
Average: 9 (5 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 115, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'degrees'' or 'degree's'?
Suggestion: degrees'; degree's
...ce continuing to dominate at 45% of the degrees given. Medicine retained second place d...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, second, similarly, third, while, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1056.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44329896907 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64396311839 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572164948454 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.0612367028 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.6 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122635460939 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503244238776 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623412703482 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0809409826161 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624836046938 0.0819641961636 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.