Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
We all have a part to play in making our home planet greener, but many believe that there are still too many wastes not recycled at home. These people believe that to strictly enforce this, legislators should amend laws requiring families to practice recycling their wastes. In my opinion, the problem of waste management is only getting worse, therefore, concrete measures such as this are needed to rehabilitate our planet.
Recycling is a proven measure in managing our waste. It helps give purpose to materials that are otherwise considered trash. Therefore, imposing this practice to everyone will greatly improve our efforts to help mother nature. If a law is passed requiring everyone to recycle their waste, then this small effort, if done by all, will be converted to a much more bigger effort towards reducing our waste.
In addition, legislation makes it easy for government to set aside funds to help families who are having difficulties managing their waste. Furthermore, this will help raise awareness and education on how serious our waste problem is and that everyone has an obligation to help the government in solving this problem.
In summary, enforcing laws to require every home to recycle their waste will help in the government’s effort to find a greener solution to our waste management. Also, this will help make everyone aware regarding the seriousness of this problem and how serious is the government in trying to solve this issue. In the end, this will help mainstream our efforts in restoring our home planet to the way it used to be.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'bigger' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: bigger
...one by all, will be converted to a much more bigger effort towards reducing our waste. I...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... trying to solve this issue. In the end, this will help mainstream our efforts in...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, regarding, so, still, then, therefore, in addition, in summary, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1318.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04980842912 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69311323257 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570881226054 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1167796238 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.833333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18901415692 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0811647440999 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585969820956 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131936556932 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550131185917 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.