The charts below show the growth in the population in some of the world’s largest cities as well as the population distribution in urban and rural areas.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph compares, the surge in the population in few of the world’s biggest cities with the urban and rural areas for a period of three years.
Overall, there is a comparison, between the Tokyo, the New York, the Shanghai, the Bombay and the Jakarta with the population, for a span of three years namely 1970, 1990 and 2010.
In all the countries, even in both the rural and the urban areas, there is a significant growth of the population in the year 2010, with the Tokyo at the top by contributing more than 28%, whereas the Bombay comes below it, with a percent above 26 and below 28. It is interesting to note, that the Bombay has had a drastic growth of its population since 1970, while the New York is the only one country to have a steady growth from 1970.
However, there is a good rise in the rate of the crowd, when compared between 1970 and 1990. In the year 1990, the Tokyo again stands at the peak with above 20%, and it is followed by the Bombay accounting above 10%. All the countries, the urban and the rural areas start of 1970 with a increased population, but the Jakarta starts its rate only between 0-5%, which is the minimum in contrast to the others.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 286, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... and the rural areas start of 1970 with a increased population, but the Jakarta s...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, whereas, while, as for, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 974.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.42727272727 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33105161953 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.7462951138 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.142857143 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.4285714286 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4285714286 5.23603664747 199% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150586330001 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0705947365138 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699903524912 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10090488763 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0771912846375 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.39 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.01 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.