The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year, 2016.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The pie chart illustrates, the average amount of money spent and collected on a children’s charity situated in USA for a year.
Overall, it is depicted that the revenue sources outshine the expenditures in a margin. The majority of the share was contributed by donating the foods in the revenue sources and in the same way program services in the expenditures side had a major share.
In, the revenue sources there are many sub-categories but however, in the other end there are only two subdivisions. It is clear that, there is more revenue, when compared to that of the expenditures, the former accounts for $53,561,580 and the latter accounts for $53,224,896. In the first one, the donating foods is the major shareholder, that accounts for 86.6%, whereas, on the other flip the program services entirely contribute to the expenditures, with a value of 95.8%.
Moreover, as the program services contributes to a maximum of their share, there are others services accounting for very minute amount. Although, the revenue has major contribution provided by the donating food, there are many other services, out of which the community contributions stand 2nd with a share of 10.4%, after this there is the program revenue with a share of 2.2%, there are three more services but their contribution is very negligible.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 55, Rule ID: BUT_NEVERTHELESS[1]
Message: Use simply 'but'.
Suggestion: but
...e sources there are many sub-categories but however, in the other end there are only two su...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, moreover, so, whereas, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1118.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15207373272 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97403231796 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506912442396 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 347.4 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.4384252561 43.030603864 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.75 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.125 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0618371199721 0.215688989381 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0402706512638 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0901251125559 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0748307782782 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117037708349 0.0819641961636 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.