The two bar charts depict mode of buying online tickets to theatre, concert or cinema online by three countries namely Australia, UK and Malaysia within age groups of 25 to 44 and 60 plus; along with another graph illustrating the means by which the tickets were bought like desktop, laptop or mobile phone.
All the three countries used online services to purchase tickets, with Australia and UK individuals in younger age groups using the online services proportionately higher compared to Malaysians. The most common way to buy tickets was seen by accessing desktops in all three countries, with lowest mode being mobile phones.
First graph details about 55% of individuals in Australia and UK were online ticket buys compared to only about 40 % Malaysians in age groups 25 to 44. However, individuals 65 plus were buying tickets online more than 40% in Malaysia but lower than Australians at 45 %.
Second bar graph shows Malaysia ranking highest in desktop usage to purchase, whilst only half of them use mobile phones. Similar trend is seen in UK and Australia, where the graph is lowered to half from desktop usage to laptop usage to purchase with more than 60 % desktop users lowering to around 30 % mobile phone users. However among the laptop users, UK scores the least with only 30% opting this mode to buy tickets, with Australia and Malaysia using 10%more compared to UK.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The two bar charts depict mode of buying...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... like desktop, laptop or mobile phone. All the three countries used online serv...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 294, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the lowest'.
Suggestion: with the lowest
...essing desktops in all three countries, with lowest mode being mobile phones. Fir...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... with lowest mode being mobile phones. First graph details about 55% of individ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ia but lower than Australians at 45 %. Second bar graph shows Malaysia ranking ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 335, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ring to around 30 % mobile phone users. However among the laptop users, UK scores the l...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, second
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1155.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97844827586 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48588012005 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543103448276 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.1152211786 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.375 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172499279185 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852983824719 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725717174392 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130765146023 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.077483948713 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.