Growing traffic and pollution has lead to various hazards, solution to this for many has been to increase the fuel expenses. though quite relevant, yet it abstains to tackle the issue of pollution. In the following essay we shall discuss the same.
Firstly, by hiking the fuel rates the usage of vehicles mostly private cars declines. People opt for public transportation more, for instance in London city working individuals opt for car pooling or metro as parking prices as well as fuel is expensive. Secondly, higher prices of fuel decreases the ownership of vehicles thus decreasing the pollution hence hazards will reduce to some extent.
Hiking prices wont solve all the issues, its mere tip of an icerberg, the actual problem is beneath this icerberg. Individuals who privately own cars can afford higher range fuels, or opt for diesel which is cheaper in some countries and adds higher emissions. For instance, Indians opt for deisel cars as the fuel is cheaper than petrol, but are less aware of the hazards and pollution crisis. Increasing prices wont add to future of pollution, but creating reforms and adding new laws will. for example, creating eletronic vehicles which are currently trending in united kingdom not only decrease pollution but are also economical. Another way would be to add emission tests for vehicles, to analyse the smoke and fumes emitted and thus imposing tax on older unmaintained transport.
Different countries have various reforms to implement in order to cut down pollution crisis. all reforms in the end should work towards a greener planet andreducing the green house effect. Thus implementing these would be a dream for various nations. Any new regulation will work if there is joint effort by government and citizens, else no implementation will succeed in getting reforms.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Though
...has been to increase the fuel expenses. though quite relevant, yet it abstains to tack...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 494, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...ating reforms and adding new laws will. for example, creating eletronic vehicles wh...
^^^
Line 7, column 94, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: All
... in order to cut down pollution crisis. all reforms in the end should work towards ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17567567568 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63717869478 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628378378378 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6284849495 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.75 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8125 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0855745001492 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0288785118724 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0273329652744 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0534179279537 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0191706056972 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.