the charts below show the information about land use in four countries
The pie chart illustrates the comparison between four countries: Portugal, New Zealand, Canada, and Norway, in terms of the statistics of land use for three different categories: Arable land, pasture land, non-agricultural land. Overall, it is clear that most of the land in these countries is non-agriculture. Also, except for New Zealand, the arable land in other countries is larger than the pasture land.
To begin with, the data indicates that land use by non-agricultural accounts for 96% and 93% in Norway and Canada, respectively. Portugal followed with 57%, and finally New Zealand with 51%. By contrast, the percentage of pasture land in New Zealand is the highest, at approximately 50%. It can be noticeable that New Zealand's land use for non-agricultural purposes is nearly equal to the pasture sector.
Meanwhile, land use for arable purposes is just 10% in each of the three countries, namely Canada, Norway, and New Zealand, with Canada at 2% and Norway at 1%. While 34% of the total land is used for arable purposes in Portugal, the proportion of this purpose in New Zealand is equal to Norway's, at about 1%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is nearly equal to the pasture sector. Meanwhile, land use for arable purposes ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, so, while, except for, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03191489362 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02646019216 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5202361053 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.111111111 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219326459167 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108728194074 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650547705069 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163647722225 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0768774649225 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.