The world’s natural resources such as oil, forests and fresh water are being consumed at an ever-increasing rate. What are the dangers of the situation? What can be done to solve the problem?
In today's world, the consumption rate of natural resources is increasing at an alarmingly rapid rate, especially due to soaring global population numbers. This phenomenon has led to many harmful impacts on the environment. Despite these issues, there are a number of viable measures that may assist individuals in tackling these significant environmental problems.
To begin with, it can be easily observed that the demand for natural-resource usage has caused several drawbacks in our human lives. First of all, although natural resources are so crucial to our lives, these raw materials are limited and will not be enough for us to fully utilize in the long-term future. To illustrate, heavy industrial and individual reliance on vehicles and machinery requires a great deal of oil, or petrol, to run normally. If the expenditure on oil keeps rocketing, our planet will run out of this source of energy. As a result, the economy will be negatively affected. Hence, the total national output will decrease significantly. Furthermore, the lack of natural resources may have adverse effects on the environment. Since most sources of energy that we use come from nature, the more carelessly we use them, the worse our environment will get. For instance, some forests remain devoid of trees because of deforestation, which leads to the disruption of natural ecosystems by causing certain species to become extinct as well as being responsible for the emission of greenhouse gasses. Subsequently, air pollution will increase, and people will have to deal with health problems like respiratory diseases. Additionally, fresh water is becoming a scarce commodity, while a vast number of regions are plagued by drought, which forces citizens to reduce their use of water in their daily lives. In short, if these terrible trends continue, serious environmental, physical, and atmospheric conditions will result, affecting humanity in drastic ways.
However, there are some solutions to tackle the overexploitation of natural resources. First and foremost, in order to avert such a bleak future, the government should implement strict limits on the usage of oil or encourage many conglomerates and individuals to use renewable energies, including solar, wind, or hydroelectric power. Moreover, authorities must also restrict corporations from unnecessarily clearing forests and impose heavy fines on companies that overtly misuse their power. On an individual level, people should reduce their demand for energy consumption by using public transport instead of private ones. Therefore, the progress of oil production will greatly slow down with the public's good awareness of the utilization of natural resources.
In summary, it cannot be denied that the risks of high-demand consumption of natural resources cause several issues in both the environmental and economic fields. This disturbing course must be reversed in order to avoid heading down a path of degradation of the natural environment and to secure prosperous living conditions for future generations. I believe this problem will be dealt with completely by both the government and the citizens in the near future.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in short, in summary, as a result, as well as, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 41.998997996 181% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2686.0 1615.20841683 166% => OK
No of words: 490.0 315.596192385 155% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48163265306 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70488508055 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04443285828 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 286.0 176.041082164 162% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583673469388 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 856.8 506.74238477 169% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3812374922 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.782608696 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3043478261 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69565217391 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203541400875 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0535955843896 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495136409858 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119570967292 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279124329191 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 164.0 78.4519038076 209% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in short, in summary, as a result, as well as, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 41.998997996 181% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2686.0 1615.20841683 166% => OK
No of words: 490.0 315.596192385 155% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48163265306 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70488508055 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04443285828 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 286.0 176.041082164 162% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583673469388 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 856.8 506.74238477 169% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3812374922 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.782608696 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3043478261 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69565217391 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203541400875 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0535955843896 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495136409858 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119570967292 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279124329191 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 164.0 78.4519038076 209% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.