People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns?
In today's world, with a rapid increase in the population, it is true that people in major cities are confronting a number of problems, like traffic congestion, or environmental pollution. From my point of view, the government should take actions such as encouraging people to move to suburban areas to curb vital issues before it is too late.
There are two major problems that citizens in many metropolises are grappling with. First and foremost, the increasingly heavier burden on the existing urban infrastructure leads to a lower quality of life. This is because rural immigrants in pursuit of employment opportunities keep inundating the downtown areas of most major cities. To illustrate, according to VTV, which is the most popular television channel in Vietnam, most schools and hospitals located in Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City are frequently overloaded. Therefore, these services are inaccessible to the majority of people from the lower class. Another issue is that due to prospering car ownership, more greenhouse gas emissions will be released by these cars into the air, causing a wide range of diseases like lung cancer and also climate change. Furthermore, cars take up more space than motorcycles, while their capacity to accommodate passengers is far inferior to that of a bus, and this results in bumper-to-bumper traffic, especially in downtown areas, where many drivers have to inch along to get away from the terrible congestion.
Since such problems are serious, the government should embolden citizens to move away from major cities. This might be explained by the fact that few advantages have arisen from this policy. First of all, the transfer to smaller regional territories would reduce the amount of transportation in metropolises. Hence, this would practically reduce the levels of environmental problems like air pollution. Furthermore, the relocation of places to suburban areas would relieve the current pressure on the infrastructure in the metropolis. In other words, public services in urban areas, such as hospitals or schools, might not be overcrowded because the roads would be more spacious. Thus, it ensures a smooth traffic flow with fewer accidents for city dwellers. Additionally, the resources in the countryside or other less developed regions would be better exploited as there might be available workplaces there. To illustrate, there would be more laborers during harvesting time in the countryside, or skilled and knowledgeable people would help with construction work in smaller regions. Therefore, its employees spur the growth of the local area as well as the national output.
In summary, there are many problems that people in several cities are facing. As a result, it is advisable that the government encourages residents to consider relocation to smaller regional areas with a view to solving these issues.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 343, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...curb vital issues before it is too late. There are two major problems that citize...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, in summary, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all, in other words, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 41.998997996 176% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2425.0 1615.20841683 150% => OK
No of words: 452.0 315.596192385 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36504424779 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02394945445 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 176.041082164 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546460176991 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 759.6 506.74238477 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3039963058 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.25 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230456270696 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690852183977 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783711537969 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175977590364 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0833205176193 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 78.4519038076 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.