In the modern world, it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others, it is a positive or negative development in your opinion?
In today's world, it can be seen that people are able to shop, work, and interact with others via the Internet instead of direct communication. From my point of view, this phenomenon presents both positive and negative aspects equally.
On the one hand, access to the Internet has benefited the public greatly in terms of its convenience and comfort. First of all, it can not be denied that some telecommunication online platforms, such as G-mail and Messenger, facilitate people's interaction, thus, bringing them together, no matter how old they are and where it is. For instance, an international student or an employee who works in foreign countries can deliver a message to their friends and families, even see them through online video call applications, with only the click of a mouse, regardless of geographical barriers. Furthermore, online platforms can help consumers save a huge amount of time spent traveling to malls and also seek out items or services of the highest quality without engaging in lengthy commutes, especially during extreme weather conditions like heavy tropical rain or the scorching heat of the summer. Additionally, in the intricate context of the COVID-19 pandemic, most shopping centers, and several traditional shops were banned by the governments. As a result, shopping via the Internet has become the best option to buy the necessary items at this time. In fact, goods that are sold online have been thoroughly verified before reaching consumers. Therefore, users can be assured when buying, and hence, prevent them from getting infected by the Coronaviruses that killed millions of people in the world.
On the other hand, certain detriments have arisen from excessive Internet use. First and foremost, the Internet has seriously affected our mental health, especially in terms of diminished physical and mental conditions. To illustrate, according to The New York Times, which is one of the most prestigious online news corporations, overindulgence in the virtual world would undoubtedly trigger a sedentary lifestyle, which is responsible for a number of health-related problems such as impaired vision, obesity, creating little sleep or the inability to process and express emotions. Another harmful drawback is the decline in social skills which are crucial for real-life contact. It is common for frequent social network users to feel awkward when attempting to strike up conversations with strangers or make a dialogue about social occasions. As a result, these people might eventually become socially alienated and suffer from a great sense of loneliness, and hence, they can easily suffer from numerous psychological syndromes like autism or depression when they could not communicate with others directly.
In summary, although the use of the Internet for shopping, working, and communication purposes comes with many benefits in life, I believe that the adverse impacts of this platform on health and lifestyle are far weightier.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1345, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...revent them from getting infected by the Coronaviruses that killed millions of pe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in fact, in summary, such as, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2520.0 1615.20841683 156% => OK
No of words: 466.0 315.596192385 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40772532189 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94732314124 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 292.0 176.041082164 166% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62660944206 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 776.7 506.74238477 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.314205401 49.4020404114 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.235294118 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4117647059 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58823529412 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19592262104 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584612832048 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059336511951 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135163103792 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0666070901783 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 151.0 78.4519038076 192% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.