The first bar graph illustrates the data of the different age ranges pupils study for their career and interest and the second graph depicts the expenditure for the students managed by the manager. Overall, it is obvious that the under 26 people, who study for their career has the most significant percentage, whilst the pupils of the same age group who were more likely to study for their interests only is resulted as the lowest rate.
Looking at the first bar chart details, the percentage records of under 26 age group had stood strikingly higher than other age sample about 80%, somehow, this percentage has shown dramatically plummeted approximately to 50% in the age range of over 49. Moreover, what is remarkable is the number of students who just enjoy to study has shown a gradual upsurge in the age group of 40-40. Consequently, this figure had conveyed sharply increased up to 70% at the end of over 49 age stage.
On the second bar chart, the level of investment and stimulates to the students from by boss has displayed the highest percentage for the students of under 26 up to 70%, however, this outline slightly decreased up to 45% in the mature stage of 30-39 and then this figure had gradually peaked up to 45% over the age of 49 stage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...second graph depicts the expenditure for the students managed by the manager. Ove...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o 70% at the end of over 49 age stage. On the second bar chart, the level of in...
^^^
Line 5, column 302, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is figure had gradually peaked up to 45% over the age of 49 stage.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, look, moreover, second, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1042.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69369369369 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54561502029 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527027027027 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 22.4926829268 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.3668048886 43.030603864 177% => OK
Chars per sentence: 173.666666667 112.824112599 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.0 22.9334400587 161% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 5.23603664747 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150356886966 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0813450763384 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.030988196361 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102472154021 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289497044819 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.2329268293 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 61.2550243902 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.9970731707 153% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.