The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia’s share of the Japanese tourist market. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information.
The supplied bar graph represents the figure of Japanese visitors travelling abroad from 1985 to 1995 and the line graph enumerates the share in Australia of the Japanese tourist market. The striking feature is that in the year 1995, the figure of Japanese tourists travelling abroad reached a peak.
As it is observed from the graph, there was a sequential increase in the tourists of Japan from 5 millions to 11 millions betwixt the year 1985 to 1990. A slight decline was seen by a half million in the year 1991. Whereas, a mild rise had been witnessed in year 1993 which leads the figure to 12 millions.
To continue with, a hurried rise was seen from 1985 to 1988 in Japanese visitors coming to Australia. It started from 2 percent and raised well nigh to 4.75 percent. Afterwards, there was tedious decline till year 1989. Anew, there was dramatic upsurge till 1993 and hit a high point in the same year with 6.1 percent.
Mulling over the topic, the feeblest figure of Japanese tourists was in 1985 and the share of Japanese visitors in Australia was the maximal in the year 1993.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...een by a half million in the year 1991. Whereas, a mild rise had been witnessed in year...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
well, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68393782383 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40399990628 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507772020725 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.6971896031 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.3 5.23603664747 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230491047799 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101694016182 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122915368665 0.0843802449381 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176314563158 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139304450058 0.0819641961636 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.