The bar graph illustrates the number of tourists who are Japanese and visited outside of the country in an 11 year period (from 1958 to 1995) and are measured in millions of numbers. At the same time, the line graph provides information about the percentage of Australia’s shares of Japan’s Tourist market.
Overall, it can be seen that, the amount of Tourists increased gradually and, with some fluctuation, a similar trend is also noticeable in Australia’s share market.
More clearly, the number of tourists stood at around 5 million in 1985. Afterwards, it contained to grow up gradually and reached around 1 million of tourists per year in 1990. For the next three years, this figure remained stable at around 12 million, which was followed by a significant improvement at the end of the period. The number of tourists hit a high of nearly 16 million in 1995.
On the other hand, in 1995, Australia’s share on Japanese tourist was exactly 2%. There was then a moderate upsurge for the next three years and reached to just below 5 percentages. With a slight drop, 1989 witnessed a dramatic rise on market share and it reach a peak of well over 6% and following this range , next year declined a bit this end this period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eable in Australia's share market. More clearly, the number of tourists sto...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t a high of nearly 16 million in 1995. On the other hand, in 1995, Australia&ap...
^^^
Line 6, column 262, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reaches'?
Suggestion: reaches
... a dramatic rise on market share and it reach a peak of well over 6% and following th...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 315, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...of well over 6% and following this range , next year declined a bit this end this ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1037.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84579439252 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90498536443 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598130841121 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9046536795 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.7 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2858084389 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125539104548 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0802351536134 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170499540701 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047573738075 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.