The charts below show the percentage of men and women in different weight groups in England between 1993 and 2002.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graphs illustrate average figures of different weight categories were classified according to gender in England over a period of 9 years from 1993 to 2002.
It is clear that in both sexes, the English people significantly was in overweight group and the proportion of people had dangerously obese almost zero over the period shown.
In 1993, almost half of English women were overweight whereas healthy weight group was the biggest category for men, the ratio of overweight men just stood in second position, with approximately 42%. It had an approximation between the obese rate of both genders, but women's was a little more, around 12% and 10% respectively.
By 1998, healthy weight men in English started to decrease and was dropped to second position while the first place was overweight group, which increased steadily over time. Simultaneously, healthy weight women proportion had a fast fall, dropped to about 32%, and this number was maintained in later stages. Then, in the final, the figures did not have many changes.
Comments
The given chart illustrates
The given chart illustrates how many men and women in Britain enrolled in tertiary education in 3 periods and whether their studies were part-time or full-time.
Overall, there were more people studying full-time than part-time in all periods. However, while the number of female students increased remarkably over the periods shown, that of male students decreased moderately.
As for part-time education, the number of men doubled over the 20-year period, rising from 100 thousand in 1970/71 to 200 thousand in 1990/91. The figure for women choosing this path was also approximately 200 thousand, which was substantially higher than the number of 40 thousand in 1970/71.
With regard to full-time courses, there was a considerable growth of 400 thousand in the number of women to 1.1 million, which was the highest quantity in any period for any kind of studying. In contrast, the number of men pursuing full-time studies dropped from 1 million to roughly 800 thousand between 1970/71 and 1980/81, though it then grew slightly to 900 thousand in the next 10 years.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 877.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15882352941 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73933919746 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629411764706 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9765004606 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.285714286 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149586852722 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672741416475 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474685420738 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0922488699898 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046760869399 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.