The charts below show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and town B in 1960 2010

The chart illustrates the proportion of people working in different fields in town A and town B from 1960 to2010.
Overall, it can be seen that the percentage of citizens working in services sector in both towns A and town B increased, while there was a decrease in manufacturing field in town A and B during the period shown.
Turning to the chart for the detail, in 1960, manufacturing sector accounted for 41% of working people in town A, compared to 70% of those in town B. There were about 30% of town A’s labor force working in sales and services fields, which was much higher than those in town B, at 20% and 10% respectively.
By 2010, services field peaked at 64% of the working population in town A, in comparison with a significant increase in those of town B (25%). In addition, the percentage of people working in manufacturing sector in town A and B experienced a considerable fall at 20% and 53% respectively. Notably, there was a double decline in sales sector in town A, to 16%, whereas sales field in town B grew slightly to 22%.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 863.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54210526316 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84095980816 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478947368421 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 29.324364739 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.285714286 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1428571429 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.528144234048 0.215688989381 245% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.286202621644 0.103423049105 277% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100146759559 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.372124026961 0.15604864568 238% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653867004903 0.0819641961636 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.