The charts below show the percentage of people working in different sectors in Town A and B in two years. 1960 and 2010.
The four pie charts combine to manifest the employee scenarios categorised by various sectors in two towns between 1960 and 2010.
Overall, the dominance sector in town B came to the sale industry and remained unchanged throughout the given timeline. Meanwhile, despite its lower starting point, manufacturing figures in town A became the most significant segment after half a century.
As observed, 41% was the quantity of the sales sector in town A and it was moderately higher than the counterparts by roughly 10%. Nevertheless, after 50 years, that data declined noticeably by about 20%; similarly, the services industry managed a fall to half of its initial point, being only 16%. By contrast, the manufacturing figures implied a surge from 29% to 64%.
Turning to town B, the indicator of the sales market far exceeded, being recorded at 70% in 1960, after which it experienced a plunge to 53%. Notably, the proportion of the services sector doubled that of the manufacturing sector, the lowest data at only 10%. However, after making a dramatic increase, the latter was measured higher slightly than the former, which reported at 22%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 221, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'services'' or 'service's'?
Suggestion: services'; service's
...noticeably by about 20%; similarly, the services industry managed a fall to half of its ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 174, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'services'' or 'service's'?
Suggestion: services'; service's
... to 53%. Notably, the proportion of the services sector doubled that of the manufacturin...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, similarly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 966.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16577540107 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82791144323 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614973262032 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.9541743572 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.333333333 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166649940557 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701864018345 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809154848392 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1212609546 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0908897237552 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.