The graph shows the number of marriages and disvorces in the UK between 1975 and 2000.
The line graph manifests the marriage categorised in three sectors and divorce scenarios in the UK over 25 years (1975-2000).
Overall, there was an escalation in all variables whilst the divergent pattern was an accurate description for the first marriage ratios despite its overwhelming data.
As can be observed, the total marriages climbed up to the peak of approximately 650 thousands before dipping by 100 thousands and eventually negligibly went up. Starting at roughly 350 thousands, the number of first marriages then leaped to around 400 thousands in 1985, after which it managed a fall of 100 thousands after 20 years.
Turning to the lesser values, there were around 250 thousands of second marriages and 80 thousands of divorces reported in the UK in 1975. Both of them implied an increase to 220 thousands in 1990, at which point the number of divorces surpassed the counterpart and further rose slightly. By contrast, a decline from 1990 to 1995 was witnessed in the indicator of second marriages, followed by a surge to 260 thousands by the end of the given timeline.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 49, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '250 thousand'.
Suggestion: 250 thousand
...to the lesser values, there were around 250 thousands of second marriages and 80 thousands of di...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 87, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '80 thousand'.
Suggestion: 80 thousand
...d 250 thousands of second marriages and 80 thousands of divorces reported in the UK in 1975. Bo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 913.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07222222222 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83920415731 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627777777778 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 16.2430518898 43.030603864 38% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 130.428571429 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177872376568 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0862370704413 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0888028099147 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119604803044 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0948265881513 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.