The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014.
The pie charts provided depict the proportion of volunteers by institutions over a period of 6 years from 2008 to 2014.
Overall, it is evident that the portion of volunteers by art and educational agencies decreased whereas the opposite was true of the remaining organizations from 2008 to 2014, and the figure for educational institution ranked in the first in 2008 while that of environmental agencie was the largest in 2014.
As can be seen from the pie charts given, the percentage of volunteers by educational organization in 2008 was the largest, with about a quarter (24%), which was higher compared to that of environmental and art institutions, with almost 21% and 18%, respectively. The figure for health care agency represented the minority, with merely 7%, which was 3 times lower than that of environmental organization. There was a similar proportion (15%) being distributed on sport and other institutions.
As far as the pie charts are concerned, there was a negative correlation between the figure for environmetal and that of educational agencies between 2008 and 2014, in which the former rose to approximately three in ten (29%) in order to rank in the first and the latter slipped to about 17%. The portion of volunteers by sport organization showed a surge to almost a quarter (25%), while the figure for art institution dipped to merely 12%. The figure for health care agency still ranked in the last, which constituted the minority, with approximately 8%. There was a fall of other organizations to about one in ten (9%).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The pie charts provided depict the propo...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a period of 6 years from 2008 to 2014. Overall, it is evident that the portion ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ental agencie was the largest in 2014. As can be seen from the pie charts given...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...buted on sport and other institutions. As far as the pie charts are concerned, ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, still, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1283.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 257.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99221789883 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09496325655 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.459143968872 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 393.3 283.868780488 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.4961285082 43.030603864 201% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 142.555555556 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5555555556 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258821583001 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109605776456 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0920780797527 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187308882762 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484590521193 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.