The bar chart shows the average size class in primary schools and lower secondary schools in 6 countries compared to the world average in 2006.
The bar chart provided depicts the average number of pupils per class in primary and lower secondary educational institutions in 6 different nations compared to the world average in 2006.
Overall, it is evident that the average size class in primary schools in the UK, Denmark and Iceland was higher than in lower secondary schools whereas the opposite was true of the remaining countries and the world average.
As can be seen from the bar chart given, South Korea had the largest average number of students per class in both primary and lower secondary educational institutions in 2006, which was about 34 and 36 students, respectively. There was not much difference between the figure for primary and lower secondary schools of Japan and the world average. The figure for lower secondary educational institutions in Mexico was almost 30 pupils per class, which was higher compared to that of primary schools.
As far as the bar chart is concerned, there was a big difference between the average number of students per class in primary and lower secondary schools in the UK, which the former was merely 27 pupils and the latter was approximately 18 pupils. The figure for primary and lower secondary educational institutions of Denmark and Iceland had not much difference, particularly that of Iceland, which both kinds of schools were almost the same (21 and 20 students per class).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The bar chart provided depicts the avera...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...compared to the world average in 2006. Overall, it is evident that the average ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ining countries and the world average. As can be seen from the bar chart given,...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r compared to that of primary schools. As far as the bar chart is concerned, th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1158.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0347826087 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68812413072 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.417391304348 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 362.7 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.4864924513 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.428571429 112.824112599 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.8571428571 22.9334400587 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.462518981211 0.215688989381 214% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.265178563579 0.103423049105 256% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108774058913 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.359387554009 0.15604864568 230% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692713243422 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 61.2550243902 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.3012195122 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.49 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.