The given illustrations compare six areas based on the proportion of their water consumption in industry, agriculture and houses.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is apparent that excluding Europe and North America which their major consumption is in the industry, the others use water mostly for agricultural purposes.
Getting back to the details, Europe and North America pursue a similar pattern. For instance, slightly more than half of the water resources in the former nation is used in the industry followed by 32% in agriculture and the remain 15% in homes. Likewise, the trend in North America in each sector is 48%, 13% and 39% respectively.
By contrast, in the other nations, the lions share of water is consumed in agriculture, while the least is allocated to the industry. To elaborate, in South America, water for agricultural uses is estimated to be 71% and between 80% and 90% in others. What is more, in the mentioned district, industrial uses is approximately half of the domestic uses (19% against 10%) and only 2% less in Africa and Central Asia (7% against 9% in the former and 5% against 7% in the later area). However, from the 19% water left in South East Asia, the mass proposition (12%) is used in the industry.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...stry followed by 32% in agriculture and the remain 15% in homes. Likewise, the trend in No...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, likewise, look, so, while, for instance, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1037.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91469194313 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81645015147 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578199052133 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2577320864 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.222222222 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19355843835 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782435103612 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493799392918 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118406838625 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330322270147 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.