The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarize thee information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.
Summarize thee information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Information given in the pie charts depict use of water in six regions of the world for three activities.
Firstly, for industrial purpose, the highest percentage had been from Europe at 53% which had been closely followed by North America at 48%. On the other hand, Central Asia had used water the lowest on industrial purpose, five times less than Europe, only 5%. Similarly, South East Asia, South America and Africa respectively had been used lower percentages of 12%,10% and 7%.

Secondly, three countries had used water more than three quarter for agriculture, where the highest proportion from Central Asia at 88%, followed by Africa and South Asia at 84% and 81%. At the same time ,South America it had been 71%.Nevertheless,in Europe and North America it is less than half ,where 32% for and 39% respectively. Finally, the least use of all countries had been Domestic use where in South and Central Asia had 7% each .The highest in that category had been South America with 19% usage.

In conclusion, agriculture is the main purpose that the water being used by four countries where as the other two it had been for industrial purpose.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 204, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...th Asia at 84% and 81%. At the same time ,South America it had been 71%.Neverthele...
^^
Line 4, column 236, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Nevertheless
...ame time ,South America it had been 71%.Nevertheless,in Europe and North America it is less ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 248, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...uth America it had been 71%.Nevertheless,in Europe and North America it is less tha...
^^^
Line 4, column 297, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e and North America it is less than half ,where 32% for and 39% respectively. Fina...
^^
Line 4, column 428, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...stic use where in South and Central Asia had 7% each .The highest in that categor...
^^
Line 4, column 441, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e in South and Central Asia had 7% each .The highest in that category had been So...
^^
Line 4, column 443, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...in South and Central Asia had 7% each .The highest in that category had been South...
^^^
Line 6, column 92, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
... the water being used by four countries where as the other two it had been for industria...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, nevertheless, second, secondly, similarly, so, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 959.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91794871795 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64863727631 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517948717949 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.114634146341 1745% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.7275022215 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.875 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 5.23603664747 248% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1567053535 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0966115696988 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747457967961 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14941307885 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0761833069434 0.0819641961636 93% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.