The charts below show the profit made by MG Entertainment from different formats in three European countries.
The bar charts represent the profits generated by MG Entertainment in 1997 and 2007 from sales of different music formats in Germany, France and Italy.
Overall, CDs remain the most profitable music format for MG Entertainment in both years. However, during the 20-year period, Internet downloads observed the strongest growth in profitability, whereas cassettes and vinyl witnessed the sharpest drops.
In closer detail, in 1997, music packaged in CDs and sold in shops and online were the most profitable for MG Entertainment. CDs bought in shops in particular generated extremely high profits of 45 million, 25 million and 20 million euros in Germany, France and Italy respectively. Cassettes and vinyl also saw high profits, totalling 15 million in Germany, 17 million in France and 23 million euros in Italy. By contrast, the then-new format of Internet downloads created negligibly profit in this year.
Two decades later, in 2007, CDs still reign supreme for MG Entertainment, accounting for 33 million, 21 million and 14 million euros in profits in Germany, France and Italy respectively. Internet downloads were also highly profitable in this year, creating a profit of 5 million euros in Germany and neighbouring France, and 3 million for Italy. Most strikingly, however, is the sharp drop in profitability experienced by cassettes and vinyl. While these formats were highly profitable only two decades prior, by 2007, both formats failed to generate any extra money.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, still, then, whereas, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1263.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42060085837 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91772270542 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515021459227 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 363.6 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3448499313 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.818181818 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1818181818 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173994027386 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0884487899558 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0872665442821 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153281823973 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0930277330599 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.