The charts below show the proportion of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two pie charts compares the percentage of British students who are native English speakers can speak other languages in one college between 2000 and 2010. Overall, the data of students are able to use other languages fluently had slightly increased over a decade of the timeframe.
First, in 2000, British students who are able to speak French took by 15 percent of the whole. This data also shared the same figures with the propotion of whom can speak additional language. Second, German speakers who are British students stood at 15 percentage while the number of Spanish - spoken students was twice as much as German which was 30 percent.
In 2010, the figure of each languages only rose gradually compared to which in 2000. Subsequently, the percentage of Spanish speakers was still the highest among the others with 35 percent. Furthermore, the data of German and other languages also increased by 5 percent. However, 2010 saw a slightly fall of French users who are British students whose the number only consumed one tenth of the whole chart.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 328, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nish - spoken students was twice as much as German which was 30 percent. In 20...
^^
Line 5, column 290, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('fall') instead of another adjective.
...creased by 5 percent. However, 2010 saw a slightly fall of French users who are British studen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 308, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt. However, 2010 saw a slightly fall of French users who are British students wh...
^^
Line 5, column 348, Rule ID: WHOSE_DT[5]
Message: Did you mean 'who's'?
Suggestion: who's
... French users who are British students whose the number only consumed one tenth of t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, second, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 884.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99435028249 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49782129532 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553672316384 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3624199169 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2222222222 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289581163527 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126387640703 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0803887410848 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218466451779 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554716732618 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.